WAY-UP STRUCTURES : PART-1
Introduction
“Which way’s up?”
With rocks, the answer is not always clear.
If layered rocks have experienced
mountain building, they may be rotated from their original horizontal positions
into vertical orientations, potentially confusing geologists, since the
principle of superposition no longer applies.
Consider the hypothetical example
illustrated in the Figure 1: you discover a vertical sequence of strata. In one
layer, you find evidence of a mass extinction event. In another layer, you find
evidence of glaciation. Did an ice age cause the extinction? Or did the
extinction somehow trigger the ice age? In order to pose intelligent questions about causality,
you need to know which one is older. The older event can influence the more
recent event, but not the other way around.
Figure 1: An exciting outcrop: but in order to interpret it correctly, we need to know which strata are older, and which are younger.
Even more extreme is when compressive
stresses associated with convergent plate tectonic settings manage to fold beds
into up-side-down positions. If the beds are up-side-down in such a tectonic inversion,
it could really throw off the interpretations of the Historical Geologist: they
would be reading Earth history backward!
In such situations, we need reliable
tools in order to accurately interpret which direction was “up” when the rock
originally formed. We
call these patterns that look different right-side-up compared to up-side-down
by the general term “way-up structures.” Some geologists also call them
“geo-petal structures.”
Way-up indicators are critical for
figuring out the correct sequence of geologic units. The help us determine
“younging direction,” the direction in which strata get younger. (This is the
same as paleo-“up” or “facing direction.”)
The welter of terminology shouldn’t
turn us off: it’s an indication that geologists put a strong emphasis on
finding and relying on way-up structures. Consider this example (Figure
2):
Figure 2: Geopetal structures that point in the paleo-“up” direction (red arrows) are of critical value in deciphering the story told by a sequence of strata.
Three layers are shown in outcrop at
Earth’s surface, color-coded green, blue, and yellow. They are folded into what
appears to be a series of anticlines and synclines. Given superposition alone,
we would assume the lowest one is oldest, and the uppermost one is youngest.
However, way-up structures in these three units point downward as the “up” or
younging direction. Therefore, the exposed layers are part of a larger-scale
fold, and the upper (upright) portion of that fold has been removed by the
forces of erosion. Without the way-up indicators, we would have been fooled. So,
they are very important.
So, what are these
geo-petal tools, exactly?
The key thing is that a way-up structure must be display
some difference between its top and its bottom. They always look different
up-side-down compared to right-side-up.
In sedimentary
rocks, the following way-up structures can aid the historical
geologist in figuring out the paleo- “up” direction:
·
cavity
fills
·
crossbeds
·
ripple
marks
·
mudcracks
·
graded
beds
·
loading
structures
·
sole
structures
·
burrows
·
stromatolites
In igneous
rocks, there are fewer options, but a few that are handy
include:
·
vesicle
concentration
·
apophyses
·
pillow
structures
·
in
a few rare intrusions, primary structures including grading and cross-bedding(!)
Metamorphic
rocks develop no
way-up structures as a consequence of metamorphism, but sometimes primary
structures in a sedimentary or volcanic protolith can potentially survive as
discernible patterns in lower-grade metamorphic rocks. Higher-grade metamorphic
rocks are so thoroughly recrystallized that any original geopetal structures
would be destroyed.
A Note of Caution
Be cautious about leaping to big, important conclusions
from a single way-up structure. The way-up indicators shown on this page are
hopefully straightforward, but nature is vast and varied. Examples seen in the
field can frequently be ambiguous. The careful historical geologist will search
for as many examples as possible; to see if they agree with one another.
Careful geologists seek a preponderance of evidence before settling on an
interpretation.
Sedimentary Way-Up Structures
We’ll begin with an examination of way-up structures in
sedimentary deposits, whether lithified into sedimentary rock or in an
unconsolidated state (but after deposition).
Cavity fills
When an empty space exists in a sedimentary deposit, such
as the protected little hollow under a shell, it can be partially filled by
sediment. We call this little pocket of space a “void” or a “cavity.” If the cavity is entirely
filled with sediment, it’s useless as a geo-petal structure. It only has geo-petal
value if it is partially filled in with mud. In fact, this is geo-petal in the
strictest sense of the term: it refers to these cavity fillings. Here is how it works: the mud
settles under the influence of gravity, lining the bottom of the space (but not
the top of the space). Later, as groundwater moves through the sediment,
it carries with it dissolved ions, which may bond together, filling the
available space with crystals. In the example in Figure 3, the crystals formed are of the mineral calcite, which
occurs in a coarse form geologists call “spar.”
Figure 3: In cavity fills, mud
fills a portion of the empty space at the bottom and later diagenetic
deposition of calcite fills in the remaining empty space (at the top) with
spar.
Use this principle to examine the following Figure 4, showing a cross-section through a bed of limestone
collected in West Virginia. It has intentionally placed in a vertical position
to examine. As you will see, the limestone includes many snail shells
(gastropod fossils). A lot of them show this key pattern of infilling with two
substrates: gray limy mud
and white calcite spar.
Note that because the shells are made of calcite also, both the original shell
and the subsequent spar appear the same coarse crystalline white:
Figure 4: Geopetal fossils in Limestone.
Which way is depositional “up” in this sample (Figure
4)? You can use the rotation the image to test various
orientations, until you get the mud at the (original) bottom and the spar above
it in the (original) top of the available space.
Hopefully you determined that the side of the sample next
to the pencil was originally “down” (Figure
5).
Quiz X1:
Question: Is this sample right-side-up or up-side-down? Explain? ![]() |
Option A: Right-side-up, since
the bottom is filled with mud, and the empty cavity at the top is partially
filled with sparry calcite crystals. Option B: Up-side-down, since the the bottom is partially filled with sparry calcite crystals, and the top is
filled with mud. |
Answer: Right-side-up, since
the bottom is filled with mud, and the empty cavity at the top is partially
filled with sparry calcite crystals. |
|
Question: Examine this sample for cavity fills. Which way is depositional "up?" |
Option A: The bottom of the
screen (opposite the side where the scale is) is the original depositional
"up" direction. Option B: The top of the screen (where
the scale is) is the original depositional "up" direction. Option C: On the left of the screen
(where the biggest shells are) is the original depositional "up"
direction. |
Answer: The top of the screen
(where the scale is) is the original depositional "up" direction. |
Find me on my other social media platforms:
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/confident_learning/?hl=en
TELEGRAM: https://t.me/Confident_Learning
BLOG: https://confidentlearning.blogspot.com/2021/05/Aspirants-JAM-GATE-GEOLOGY.html
E-MAIL: mk.confidentlearning@gmail.com
Website: www.rfhi.in
No comments:
Post a Comment